Ethical Leadership Thinking: When we Attack an Issue

Ethical Leadership Thinking: Attacking Issues

When dealing with a troublesome business problem, it’s easy to get carried away and begin to attack people instead of the problem. This wastes time, takes energy away from finding solutions and leaves people demoralized.

Let’s look at the important differences between attacking people and attacking issues:

When we Attack a Person our Language is Less Respectful and Our Thinking is Narrowing

When we attack people, our thinking narrows and our approach is not usually responsible. Our words may not be carefully chosen and we may speak in anger.

We use raised voices and disrespectful language
We accuse and blame, which leads away from solutions
We have no tolerance for other perspectives

When we Attack an Issue, We are More Respectful and Our Thinking is Broadening

When we attack issues, we use a much more respectful approach with others. We focus on getting a more complete perspective, and seek to understand the issue more clearly.

We are seeking information
We are seeking understanding
Other perspectives help us understand the issue
We are more respectful

Examining Our Thinking and Our Leadership

If you think that as a leader you would never attack a person, ask yourself this question:

Have I ever made remarks (even if they are made privately or intended to be a joke) about a political party, person, organization, entity, club, or any other group of persons that sounded disrespectful to anyone else? How did it make them feel? Did they let me know?

When we attack a person or group, we erode trust, even if the person we are attacking is not there. If we will attack someone who is not present it raises the concern that we may berate others when they are not there to defend their reputations.

Attacking Issues or Attacking People?