By Linda Fisher Thornton
Ignoring complexity reduces the number of variables considered in a decision. That may seem convenient (see last week’s post) but it also removes the nuanced thinking that is necessary for ethical decision-making. With all the information available in a socially connected world, it is easy to fall victim to the quick oversimplified understanding of issues. This “quick glance” way of gathering information doesn’t reveal the breadth and depth of what’s really going on.
“The contemporary context also reflects the fact that issues associated with access to information and with technology may enhance the temptation and ease of making unethical choices.”
— Mark Winston, The Complexity of Ethical Decision Making, Information Ethics
Basing decisions on “quick glance” information gathering is not just uninformed and unwise, it can be harmful. It is definitely in a leader’s best interest to learn about the nuances and avoid the temptation to make a quick potentially unethical decision. Here are some ways that removing complexity can get us into deep ethical trouble:
- Without acknowledging complexity, we may only look at the variables we already understand and ignore others that are critical to the decision
- Without acknowledging complexity, we may only look at the short-term impact and ignore the long-term risks
- Without acknowledging complexity. we may decide only based on self-interest and personal gain
- Without acknowledging complexity, we may leap into something that does more harm than good
- Without acknowledging complexity, we may quickly show our ignorance to others who took the time to understand the nuances
- Without acknowledging complexity, we may make our own job harder by creating more problems than we solve
We can’t simply review one or two articles that reinforce our own beliefs about an issue and make an ethical decision. It takes more effort than that to understand the variables. Who are the constituents? What are their needs and goals? What is the presenting problem? Is that a symptom of a bigger problem? Do we understand that bigger problem and how the two are connected? If we try to fix a symptom without addressing the cause how will that make things worse? What other global issues and trends impact this problem? How? What are the most ethical options given all of the connected variables?
“Solving a problem” without understanding the context is like changing individual notes in a song without considering the effect on the song. The result can be a meaningless mess.
Here’s the key point – There is no good leadership without ethical thinking and ethical thinking requires digging into the nuances of complex issues. In a global society, our problems are connected in intricate boundary-spanning ways. Globally, we have the thinking power to untangle our complex problems and make the best choices. We just need to choose to use it.
Special Series Celebrating the 2nd Printing of 7 Lenses:
Why Ethical Thinking Matters (Part 1)
Why Ethical Thinking Matters (Part 2)
Why Ethical Thinking Matters (Part 3)
Why Ethical Thinking Matters (Part 4)
Why Ethical Thinking Matters (Part 5)
©2018 Leading in Context LLC